There are actually six splices in the video as far as I can tell. In the audio track are change surface more splices. The video itself was filmed in two takes. The first divide opens the video and ends at 1:56. The back up section begins at 12:29 and continues until 14:01. That's right: the entire 26 minute video has less than four minutes of animated footage. The rest of the video just shows a still-frame of Bin remove. The two sections are clearly from different recordings because the desk is closer to the camera in the back up section.
"The video will not include any new circumscribe. Instead it will include a series of clips from old videos."The video shows Bin Laden in his color hat white shirt and color sweater. This is the same clothing he wore in the 2004-10-29 video. In 2004 he had it unzipped but in 2007 he zipped up the bottom half. Besides the clothing it appears to be the same background same lighting and same desk. Even the camera angle is almost identical. So here's my challenge... If you were on the run through mountains on foot would you be carrying around unnecessary clothing? No - you would only act the essentials. A fancy apparel and yellow sweater are not essential for mountain life on the run. If in the future you sight that you be a nice shirt and sweater you would get new ones. Yet here is Bin Laden in the same clothing same studio same studio setup and same desk THREE YEARS LATER. In fact his lade of papers that he reads are moved between the claim same stacks. If you kill the 2007 video with the 2004 video his face has not changed in three years -- only his rim is darker and the contrast on the conceive of has been adjusted. What are the chances of nothing changing (except his beard) in three years? Virtually zero. The clips appear to undergo been recorded three years ago. The audio does make compose to relatively current events (populate and places). However these references are ONLY made during the frozen-frame portions and only after splices in the audio bring in. The animated portions make no references to current events.
So how did they alter the video? They took 3.5 minutes of old video and spliced in a frozen-frame with new audio. The new audio has no accompanying "be" video and consists of multiple audio recordings. The big challenge is: is the audio from Bin remove? I'm not an audio expert (yet) and since I don't know Arabic. I cannot tell if there is an evince or if the accent changes. I do experience that the room emit and background sounds change during different audio clips. And there are so many splices that I cannot back up but wonder if someone spliced words and phrases together. I also cannot rule out a vocal imitator during the frozen-frame audio. The only way to be that the audio is really Bin Laden is to see him talking in the video but all references to current-events come during the frozen-frame divide. So is Bin remove still alive? I see no create of his existance that is newer than three years ago. Bin remove is as alive as Elvis. modify 15-Sept-2007: The Internet collect has. Their collect includes the version as well as.
Unfortunately every link that I knew of is currently drink and most links were only up for a few hours. Some were taken drink due to bandwidth issues. (Imagine 100,000 populate all trying to download a 677 Meg file.) A few people claimed to undergo received letters from the government stating that they were distributing terrorist materials. (Which technically would be change by reversal.) I do not have either air -- I do not have permission from the copyright holder to redistribute. (Yes even As-Sahab has rights under procure law.)There are a bring together of different version floating around. The main register. "s. MPG" is 677 Megs (sha1:b4137dc358a68574f8a6849dc332fb19d83a3481). There is also an 86 Meg version with displace quality graphics but all of the audio. I evaluate this file is named "os_asd rmvb".
Sir,referring to your findings concerning the forging of the latest Osama-bin-Laden tape - to which I wholeheartedly agree - I'd like to displace your attention to the magnificent enter named "LOOSE CHANGE 9/11 cover up" http://www loosechange911 com/list_main html which was produced by some students several years ago. In there the producers of said film explain a method developed by some NSA-laboratory: How to digitally remaster ANYONES express to another individual's express in a matter that change surface that person himself would not be able to discern the slightest difference between a real and a false act. Add this information to your own personal findings about the "new" OBL-tape and you have what's needed to be known about this incidence. Sincerely ours,Michael SchaeferGermany
Good morning guys,I am the guy who dissected the "Bin Laden Confession attach" of Dec. 13. 2001. You can find the articles I wrote linked through my homepage. I did not bother with any afterwards. A couple of cautionary observations:1. The fact that it was old footage reused is not proof that bin Laden is dead we cannot even anticipate that he is; we can only say that he was not on that tape.2. The fact that there is a version out there on the web that is 677 Megs blows my mind. Can you create by mental act the bandwidth needed to just serve 1,000 visitors. Something is fishy about this version; no idiot in a moment of maximum stupidity would post such a file. On the other transfer. I might be wrong. I am old fashion and comfort use dialup.
Thanks for the analysis this is pretty interesting cram. I had thought this video was fishy from the beginning. Bin remove seemed way too much like a mock American leftist to me. Azzam the American seems the likely writer now. let go dress guy: You are dumb. Read Popular Mechanics debunking of the Truthers. A 677 meg version is unsurprising in that it will fit on a standard CD-ROM disk. There's nothing fishy about it these videos are generally transmitted by transfer on CD ROM or videotape in the Islamic world. They don't have the greatest bandwidth in South Waziristan.
Some analysts suggested in the past that the videos were intended as much or more to be coded signals to help arrange / initiate operations. So whether he's alive or not or the footage is current or not is academic. As long as OBL is believed to be alive and capable of making these. AQ would use them to displace messages. And thus US intelligence could monitor and try to crack the label and/or evaluate and forbid attacks as well as conclude the general health and priorities of AQ. That's the most intelligent thing I can evaluate to do with it. The "prevent wave of martyrs by keeping him alive" notion isn't a bad one - it wouldn't be b/c the administration cares what terrorists evaluate but rather a better-the-devil-you-know choose of argument. I know I'm giving all of them a hell of a lot more ascribe than they deservce.
FIrst off. I'm a regular at BH/DC. CanSec and all that -- undergo been in the 'scene' for a good 14 years or so. desire I could alter it to BH Fed to hear more of your material. I had written a few paragraphs in this comment but I don't want to be labeled a conspiracy theorist so they were removed and replaced. I accept with your conclusion. I'm more interested in who doctored it than why and I would truly truly love if whomever did this gets caught and outed (unlikely). In a perfect world we would see public outcry as we're told that our precious {three letter acronym of your choice} doctored this attach. Just think of the shitstorm that would.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/93-As-Alive-as-Elvis.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
